Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/elkadotc/public_html/plugins/system/helix3/core/classes/menu.php on line 89

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/elkadotc/public_html/plugins/system/helix3/core/classes/menu.php on line 258

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/elkadotc/public_html/plugins/system/helix3/core/classes/menu.php on line 258

 We are looking for investors to support a new start up company  which is going to use the new Tardin technology for electricity production. You can be one of them even your investment is a couple of thousands euro. 

The webpage is in progress!

 

Newsletter subscription

STERN-GERLACH EXPERIMENT

 STERN-GERLACH EXPERIMENT

1.3.1 Experiment description

In 1922 Stern and Gerlach made an experiment with intention to verify the Bohr-Sommerfeld model of the atom by measuring the quantized states of angular momentum. According to Sommerfeld theory, the movement of electron around nucleus generates a magnetic moment linked to the angular moment.
In the theory of Bohr Sommerfeld the orbital momentum could take only discrete values, so the direction of the vector was restricted to only a limited number of possibilities, and this could be tested by making use of the fact that an orbiting electron will generate a magnetic moment proportional to the orbital angular momentum. Of course in the atom not only electrons have spin. The elements of the nucleus also have it. But protons and neutrons are much heavier than electrons (about 1836 times), and the magnetic dipole moment is inversely proportional to the mass. So the contribution of proton's and neutron's magnetic dipole momentum to atom total momentum is smaller comparatively with electron contribution.
The atoms of silver from the source, which was a furnace with boiling silver, were evaporated and passed through thin slides in order to obtain a flat beam of atoms.
The inhomogeneous magnetic field spreads the silver atoms along direction of inhomogeneous field, and these modifications are detected onto a screen (fig 1.4). A splitting of the beam, into two parts, one above and one below the original beam was observed. The geometry of the Stern-Gerlach magnet is such that the inhomogeneity is only in one direction (Bz varies with z), but is mostly independent of x and y.

Gerlach001

Figure 1.4 Stern Gerlach devices

Ulterior experiments with other elements having approximately the same electronic configuration (hydrogen, potassium, cooper, gold, sodium etc.) conducted at similar results.
In the absence of magnetic field, the trajectory of atoms is a straight line and a spot is formed on the screen. In the presence of strong magnetic field a separation of these spot in a ,,eye form shape” is observed. In many books the result is presented like two parallel lines but this is incorrect.

1.3.2 Actual interpretation

The experiment refuted the expectations of Bohr Sommerfeld theory; according to quantum spin introduced by Sommerfeld three components must appear on the screen and this not happened.
The idea of electron spin was proposed later (1925) by Uhlembec and Goudsmith and the results of experiments were adapted to be explained in conformity with spin moment of electron. According to quantum mechanic the silver atom poses an electron on a last shell in 4d.
In atoms, internal electrons are located in such way that in the each pair of electrons there is one of the upward spin and one of the downward spin so on for a filled shell the whole spin of such pair is equal zero.
The remaining electron on the outer shell in the silver atom posses a spin which is not balanced by other electron. According to quantum mechanics for this unpaired electron orbital magnetic momentum is zero, and the magnetic moment of silver atom due to this outer electron is therefore attributable only to its spin.
The z-component of the spin angular momentum  is Gerlach002 where the spin magnetic quantum number is ± 1/2.
When the spin of the electron is equal +1/2 the atom is pulled out and when the spin is equal -1/2 the atom is pulled in. So during passing through the non-homogenous magnetic field the beam of the atoms of silver undergoes splitting into the two beams.

1.3.3 ,,Classical” proposed interpretation

In a classical picture of the atom, the electron has a definite orbit around the nucleus. As will be presented in next chapter at atomic structure an electron moving around nucleus manifest two different angular momentum and correspondently two different magnetic moments.
The rotation of electron around his ax of symmetry produce a spin angular momentum and correspondently to this there is also a spin magnetic moment. In the same way the movement of electron around nucleus on an orbit can be characterized by orbital angular momentum and correspondently to this there is an orbital magnetic moment.
Between angular momentum and correspondent magnetic moment we have a relation on the following type : 

 Gerlach003(1.17)
In the same time (based on actual data!) the values for spin movement (both magnetic moment and angular moments) are supposed to be smaller then corresponding values for orbital movement.
The composition of magnetic moments for the same electron follows the classical rules of vectors so there is:

Gerlach004(1.18)
where mL, mS represents the orbital and spin magnetic moments.
Due to the arrangements of electrons in atoms, as pairs, in each pair of electrons there is compensation total magnetic moments, so, the contribution of inner shell at atomic magnetic moment is zero.

For silver with an unpaired electron, the atom magnetic moment is given by the total magnetic moment of the electron from the outer shell (1.18). The magnetic moment of nucleus is negligible.
Due to random thermal movements in the oven, the magnetic dipole moment vectors of the evaporated silver atoms will be randomly oriented in space. When such atoms enter into the inhomogeneous magnetic field the magnetic moment of atoms and correspondent angular momentum can point in any direction in three-dimensional space, but reported at direction of inhomogeneous magnetic field (Bz) there are possible only two orientations with different angles (fig. 1.5). So a silver atom can enter in magnetic field with magnetic moment oriented in the same direction or in opposite direction reported to the external magnetic field. Between atomic magnetic moments and external field direction a uniform distribution of attack angles (α) is possible. An insignificant small number of evaporated atoms can have also a ,,perpendicular” orientation of magnetic moments related to the Bz.

The external magnetic field will have two effects on the atomic magnetic dipole. First, the magnetic field will exert a torque on the magnetic dipole, in order to align the magnetic moment to the field direction, so the magnetic moment vector will precess about the direction of the magnetic field (fig 1.6). The external magnetic field can’t align atomic magnetic moments on z direction due to the linkage between electron magnetic moment and angular moment and his gyroscopic comportment; so the magnetic moments will execute a precession in an x-y plane. Secondly, and more importantly here, the non-uniformity of the field in z direction will produce force acting over the magnetic dipole; the expression of force is given by
 Gerlach005(1.20)
where  Gerlach006(1.21) is the potential energy of the silver atom in the magnetic field.

Different orientations of the magnetic moment vector μ will lead to different values of μz, which in turn will mean that there will be a forces acting on the atoms which will differ depending on the value of μz.
So the deflection of the electron on the screen is:
Gerlach007(1.21)
where L is the distance between magnet and screen, v is the velocity of atoms calculated according Maxwell Boltzman distribution.
For atomic moments orientated up the inhomogeneous magnetic field produce acceleration in the up direction, besides the precession in x-y plane. Consequently we will have a beam of atoms with intensity half from initial beam which is deviated up.
For atomic moments orientated down we will have a deviation in the down part of screen relative to the position of beam in absence of a magnetic field, and the intensity of fascicle is again half from the intensity of incident fascicle.
In the first case the atoms is forced to move up in the magnetic field and in the second case the atom is moving down.
The movement of atoms in SG experiment can be described in terms of classical physic being a composed movement due to the acceleration along z axis (positive or negative direction) and a precession movement of atomic moment in x-y plane

Gerlach008
Figure 1.5 Magnetic moment orientations in exterior magnetic field

The eye shape form of atoms scattering on the screen is due to:
-the different value of force acting on the atoms magnetic moments - different angle of attack;
-the form of the fascicle (horizontal slide)
-the form of magnet.
Using the Stern Gerlach experiment for atoms we can measure the total magnetic moment of an electron from outer shell. In case of hydrogen which poses a single electron, using this experiment we can measure the magnetic moment of one electron which is related to the total kinetic moment of electron around nucleus.

Gerlach009
Figure 1.6 Precession of magnetic moment around external magnetic field

© 2017 All Rights Reserved Coșofreț Sorin Cezar

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/elkadotc/public_html/plugins/system/helix3/core/classes/Minifier.php on line 227

Please consider supporting our efforts.for establishing a new foundation for exact sciences

Amount